Site icon Sommers Roth & Elmaleh Professional Corporation

I Signed a Consent Form—Can I Still Sue for a Birth Injury?

I signed a consent form—can I still sue for a birth injury?

Many patients assume that once a consent form is signed, the possibility of taking legal action disappears. In practice, though, the issue is more complex. Consent documents are part of the medical process, but they do not settle every question about how care was delivered. In birth injury situations, this distinction becomes important as decisions are usually made quickly and under pressure.

The role of consent must be considered alongside what occurred before, during, and after treatment. For families considering a birth injury lawsuit, the focus should not be limited to what was signed. It should also extend to if the care provided met expected medical standards.

Signing a Consent Form Does Not Mean Accepting Negligence

A consent form reflects agreement to proceed with a medical treatment after certain risks are explained. It does not mean that a patient has agreed to negligent care. This distinction is central to how claims are assessed in a medical malpractice lawsuit.

Patients may accept known risks associated with a procedure. Those risks could include complications that occur even when care is appropriate. However, this acceptance does not extend to avoidable errors.

If a procedure is performed improperly, or if established medical standards are not followed, responsibility may still arise.

What “Informed Consent” Actually Requires in Practice

In legal terms, consent must be more than a signature; it must be informed. This means the patient was given enough information to make a meaningful decision about their care. The concept of informed consent focuses on the quality of the discussion and not only on the existence of a document.

Physicians are generally expected to explain the nature of the procedure, along with risks that a reasonable patient would consider important. These are commonly referred to as material risks. Even if a complication does not happen often, it may still need to be disclosed if its impact could be critical. 

Alternatives should be discussed, including the option of not proceeding. Most importantly, the patient must understand what is being explained. Courts assessing informed consent consider if an explanation was clear enough for an ordinary person to make an informed choice or if the information was just technically provided.

Where Consent Breaks Down in Birth Injury Situations

Birth settings introduce challenges that can affect how consent is obtained. Labour is unpredictable, and decisions may need to be made quickly. In these moments, communications can become rushed or incomplete.

These factors can easily create a gap between what is documented and what was actually understood. In a birth injury lawsuit, it goes further as it becomes an evaluation key whether consent was meaningful in practice.

Consent vs. Standard of Care: Two Separate Legal Questions

Consent and standard of care could be taken as the same, but they are not because each addresses different issues:

In cases where consent is valid, healthcare providers are still expected to meet accepted medical standards. This includes proper monitoring, timely decision-making, and appropriate responses to complications. If those standards are not met, the existence of consent does not prevent further examination of the care provided.

During medical malpractice lawsuits, distinctions like this are important. The law recognizes that agreement to treatment does not eliminate the expectation of competent care.

Situations Where a Claim May Still Be Considered

Certain situations illustrate how consent and liability can diverge. In some cases, a risk may have been clearly explained, yet the procedure itself is performed incorrectly. The issue then shifts from consent to execution.

In other instances, a major complication may not have been disclosed. If a reasonable patient would have considered that information important, the consent may be viewed as incomplete.

There are also serious scenarios where care during labour, such as fetal monitoring or response time, falls below expected standards (despite prior consent).

Each of these examples can raise questions within a birth injury lawsuit. The focus always extends to how care decisions were communicated and the way medical responsibilities were fulfilled.

Evaluations in Court

As earlier stated, the court’s goal is to understand what actually happened during the interaction between patient and healthcare provider. This involves reviewing multiple sources of information.

Thus, medical records are crucial, particularly notes documenting discussions about risks and treatment options. Testimony from healthcare professionals may also be considered, along with expert opinions on what should have been disclosed in similar circumstances.

Patient recollection is another factor (common where documentation is limited or unclear). The evaluation of informed consent involves piecing together these elements to determine whether the patient was given a fair opportunity to make an informed decision.

Sommers Roth & Elmaleh Supports Families Through Birth Injury Lawsuit Claims

One of the reasons Sommers Roth & Elmaleh stands out is due to experience, compassion, and consistency on the realities families face after a birth injury. Legal issues are only one part of the picture. Day-to-day issues, long-term planning, and financial pressure often become immediate concerns in matters involving a birth injury lawsuit.

Our lawyers experience in this area includes:

Where appropriate, claims may address both the injury and the ongoing support a child may require. This can entail funding for home accessibility and modifications, such as customized living spaces or specialized equipment. Attendant care services (beyond what is available through public programs) can also factor in.

To discuss your situation in confidentiality and explore available legal options, call us at 1-844-940-2386 or reach out online.

Exit mobile version